Vetted by NeuralPress's Multi-Agent Verifier for strict factual validity and event relevance. Our compliance engine cross-checks and filters search results to ensure zero false correlations or misleading content.
Primary Sources
Court grants Apple's request to seek Samsung documents in DOJ antitrust ...
The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey has approved Apple’s request to seek documents from Samsung in South Korea in its ongoing antitrust case against the Department of Justice. Here are the details. Apple can seek Samsung evidence in South Korea Last month, Apple moved to obtain internal Samsung data from South Korea in its ongoing antitrust fight with the U.S. government over alleged monopoly practices. In its request, Apple relied on the Hague Evidence Convention, which provides a mechanism for courts to gather evidence from foreign entities in civil or commercial matters. According to Apple, Samsung is one of the most relevant third parties in the case, given its direct competition across smartphones, smartwatches, and app distribution. However, the company’s U.S. subsidiary said it would not produce records held by its Korean parent company. In response, the DOJ criticized the timing of Apple’s request, saying the company shouldn’t have waited nine months to file it. The DOJ also argued that the Hague Convention process should not be used to extend discovery or affect the trial schedule, and that Apple should bear the risk that some or all of the evidence from South Korea may not arrive in time if the court granted the company’s request. Last Friday, the court granted Apple’s request, saying it “considered the submissions of the parties,” and adding that “good cause” had been shown. Importantly, the fact that the court has granted Apple’s request doesn’t automatically mean that Samsung will have to produce the documents. Rather, the request will now move through the Hague Convention process in South Korea, where local authorities will decide whether and how to execute it. Even then, Samsung could still object or otherwise refuse to produce some or all of the records Apple is seeking. You can read the court’s decision below: Worth checking out on Amazon David Pogue – ’Apple: The First 50 Years’ MacBook Neo Logitech MX Master 4 AirPods Pro 3 AirTag (2nd Generation) – 4 Pack Apple Watch Series 11 Wireless CarPlay adapter FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.
Apple litigation - Wikipedia
This article needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (August 2025) The multinational technology corporation Apple Inc. has been a participant in various legal proceedings and claims since it began operation and, like its competitors and peers, engages in litigation in its normal course of business for a variety of reasons. In particular, Apple is known for and promotes itself as actively and aggressively enforcing its intellectual property interests.[1][2] From the 1980s to the present, Apple has been plaintiff or defendant in civil actions in the United States and other countries. Some of these actions have determined significant case law for the information technology industry and many have captured the attention of the public and media. Apple's litigation generally involves intellectual property disputes, but the company has also been a party in lawsuits that include antitrust claims, consumer actions, commercial unfair trade practice suits, defamation claims, and corporate espionage, among other matters. Additionally, Apple has also been the defendant of a class action lawsuit for the use of young children in the Democratic Republic of the Congo's cobalt-mining industry.[3] Apple is a member of the Business Software Alliance (BSA), whose principal activity is trying to stop copyright infringement of software produced by BSA members; Apple treats all its intellectual property as a business asset, engaging in litigation as one method among many to police its assets and to respond to claims by others against it.[4] Apple's portfolio of intellectual property is broad enough, for trademarks alone, to encompass several pages of the company's web site and, in April 2012, it listed 176 general business trademarks, 79 service marks, 7 trademarks related to NeXT products and services, and 2 trademarks related to FileMaker.[5] Apple claims copyright interests in multiple products and processes and owns and licenses patents of various types as well and, while it states it generally does not license its patent portfolio, it does work with third parties having an interest in product interoperability.[6] Steve Jobs alone was a named inventor on over 300 design and utility patents.[1][7] Between January 2008 and May 2010, Apple Inc. filed more than 350 cases with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office (USPTO) alone, most in opposition to or taking exception to others' use of the terms "apple", "pod"...
Apple dealt blow by Supreme Court in long-running antitrust feud ...
Apple's request to temporarily block a judicial order that found the iPhone maker in violation of sweeping court-mandated changes to its lucrative App Store was rejected. The antitrust lawsuit ...
Kagan Denies Apple's Request for Emergency Supreme Court Intervention ...
Apple became the latest tech giant to fail to obtain emergency relief from the high court in an antitrust case. Justice Elena Kagan on Wednesday denied Apple's request for emergency U.S. Supreme ...
