Vetted by NeuralPress's Multi-Agent Verifier for strict factual validity and event relevance. Our compliance engine cross-checks and filters search results to ensure zero false correlations or misleading content.
Primary Sources
High Court Denies Bail to Applicant in Fraud Case Under IPC Sections ...
Case Note & Summary The High Court dismissed the regular bail application of Applicant who was accused of offences under Sections 420, 504, 506 read with 34 of IPC -- The applicant had initially obtained anticipatory bail by undertaking to deposit Rs. 12,00,000/- but failed to comply, leading to rejection of his application on 26.10.2021 -- He then obtained regular bail from the Magistrate Court on 13.05.2022 by suppressing the fact that his anticipatory bail was rejected -- This bail was subsequently cancelled by the Additional Sessions Judge under Section 439(2) of CrPC for material suppression of facts -- The applicant remained absent during trial, leading to issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant and his arrest on 10.11.2025 -- The Court rejected his bail application citing fraud on the court, abuse of judicial process, flight risk, and criminal antecedents Headnote The High Court of Judicature at Bombay Bench at Aurangabad dismissed the bail application filed by Applicant seeking regular bail in connection registered for offences under Sections 420, 504, 506 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) -- The Court held that the applicant's conduct of suppressing material facts about the rejection of his anticipatory bail application and obtaining bail from the Magistrate Court through misrepresentation constituted fraud on the court -- The Court applied the principle established in S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath [(1994)1 SCC 1] that no court can allow a person to get advantage of an order by playing fraud -- The applicant's prolonged absence during trial, necessitating issuance of Non-Bailable Warrant, and his criminal antecedents in Crime No. 275 of 2019 were additional factors against granting bail -- The Court found the applicant to be a flight risk and held that his conduct disentitled him to discretionary relief of bail Issue of Consideration Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail considering his conduct of suppressing material facts, obtaining bail through misrepresentation, and subsequent non-appearance during trial proceedings Final Decision The High Court dismissed the bail application, holding that the applicant's conduct of suppressing material facts, obtaining bail through misrepresentation, prolonged absence during trial, and criminal antecedents disentitled him to discretionary relief of bail Law Points Fraud on the court principle established in S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu Vs. Jagannath [(1994)1 SCC 1] -- Bail consideration...
Westfield Police warn of fake RMV text scam - WWLP
Beware of a new text scam in Westfield, MA. Fake texts claim to be from the RMV, threatening license suspension for unpaid traffic citations. Stay safe!
Regular bail was granted in an economic offence involving...
Regular bail was granted in an economic offence involving alleged fraudulent availment of input tax credit under the CGST Act because the prosecution's case rested mainly on documentary material already in its possession.
Massachusetts Registry of Motor Vehicles | Mass.gov
The RMV is responsible for registering and inspecting motor vehicles, licensing drivers, and processing payments for traffic citations in Massachusetts. You can complete more than 60 transactions online by visiting the registry's Online Service Center.
