Vetted by NeuralPress's Multi-Agent Verifier for strict factual validity and event relevance. Our compliance engine cross-checks and filters search results to ensure zero false correlations or misleading content.
Token Pricing Comparison
Comparison of input processing costs per million tokens between AI models.
Primary Sources
Google Unveils Gemini 3.1 Flash TTS for Enhanced AI Speech Quality
Published: May 1, 2026 by David Wilson In Small Business News Today marks a significant advancement in accessible technology with the launch of Google’s Gemini 3.1 Flash TTS (Text-to-Speech), a model that promises to enhance user experience through improved speech quality and control. Small business owners might want to pay close attention as these developments can directly influence customer engagement and accessibility efforts within local enterprises. Google’s new model aims to elevate the clarity and expressiveness of artificial speech, making it the most natural-sounding offering from the tech giant to date. The updated TTS has achieved a notable Elo score of 1,211 on the Artificial Analysis TTS leaderboard, which evaluates models based on human preferences. This improved performance is not merely about sounding good; it has practical implications for various applications, including marketing, customer service, and accessibility enhancements. One of the standout features of Gemini 3.1 is its enhanced controllability. This feature allows developers and businesses to tailor the tone and cadence of the speech output according to specific contexts—whether it be a formal announcement, a friendly customer service interaction, or a casual marketing message. This level of customization can help small businesses maintain their brand voice across all platforms, creating a consistent experience whether the interaction is in person or through a digital medium. For small business owners, the advantages extend beyond just sounding human-like. The ability to generate high-quality, natural-sounding speech on demand opens up potential use cases that can directly impact the bottom line. For instance, companies can automate customer service response systems, providing instant, high-quality interactions that enhance customer satisfaction. Businesses could also use the technology for personalized marketing, allowing for tailored audio messages that engage customers more effectively. Some businesses have already begun exploring how TTS technology can serve their needs. Imagine a local bakery that sends out voice messages about fresh bread or new pastry recipes via their website. Or consider a small fitness studio that uses TTS for reminders about class schedules or motivational phrases to keep clients engaged. The use cases are expansive, and the ease of implementation will likely depend on the existing digital infrastructure of the business. However, small businesses sh...
Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Comparison
Want to compare interactively?Try the playgroundPerformance BenchmarksComparative analysis across standard metrics4 benchmarksGemini 3.1 Pro outperforms in 4 benchmarks (ARC-AGI v2, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.Gemini 3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.comArena PerformanceHuman preference votesPricing AnalysisPrice comparison per million tokensGemini 2.5 Pro costs lessFor input processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($2.50/1M tokens) is 2.0x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens).For output processing, Gemini 3.1 Pro ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).In conclusion, Gemini 3.1 Pro is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro.** Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokensLowest available price from all providersTue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.comGemini 3.1 ProInput tokens$2.50Output tokens$15.00Best providerGoogleGemini 2.5 ProInput tokens$1.25Output tokens$10.00Best providerGoogleContext WindowMaximum input and output token capacityBoth models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 65,536 tokens.Gemini 3.1 ProInput1,048,576 tokensOutput65,536 tokensGemini 2.5 ProInput1,048,576 tokensOutput65,536 tokensTue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.comInput CapabilitiesSupported data types and modalitiesBoth Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro support multimodal inputs.They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.Gemini 3.1 ProTextImagesAudioVideoGemini 2.5 ProTextImagesAudioVideoLicenseUsage and distribution termsBoth models are licensed under proprietary licenses.Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.Gemini 3.1 ProProprietaryClosed sourceGemini 2.5 ProProprietaryClosed sourceRelease TimelineWhen each model was launchedGemini 3.1 Pro was released on 2026-02-19, while Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20.Gemini 3.1 Pro is 9 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro.Gemini 3.1 ProFeb 19, 20262 months ago9mo newerGemini 2.5 ProMay 20, 202511 months agoKnowledge CutoffWhen training data endsBoth models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2025-01-31.They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.Gemini 3.1 ProJan 2025Gemini 2.5 ProJan 2025Provider AvailabilityGemini 3.1 Pro is available from Google. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google.Gemini ...
Gemini Updates by Google - May 2026 - Releasebot
Browse a full list of updates made to Gemini by Google. Follow to get all release notes by email, RSS, and more.
Latest Gemini Models in 2026: Pro, Flash & Flash-Lite Compared
Which Gemini model should you use? Compare Gemini 3 Pro, Flash, and Flash-Lite by pricing, 1M context windows, and use case. Updated for 2026.
