Vetted by NeuralPress's Multi-Agent Verifier for strict factual validity and event relevance. Our compliance engine cross-checks and filters search results to ensure zero false correlations or misleading content.
Primary Sources
Elon Musk says his xAI startup's models were trained on OpenAI
Elon Musk arrives for the trial of against OpenAI held at Dellums Federal Building in Oakland, on Tuesday. During Thursday testimony Musk said OpenAI’s tech was used to train his xAI.Jessica Christian/S.F. ChronicleElon Musk continued his clash with OpenAI’s attorney Thursday in Oakland federal court, with Musk saying he was being repeatedly cut off by the lawyer.Musk’s testimony during the trial’s third day also revealed that his startup xAI, which is now part of SpaceX, partially “distilled” or used OpenAI’s tech to train xAI’s artificial intelligence. That practice appears to violate OpenAI’s terms of service.As Musk sought to prove OpenAI abandoned its nonprofit mission to improve humanity in favor of making money, he affirmed during cross-examination that there was no document saying OpenAI couldn’t create a for-profit affiliate. He also said there was no document stipulating the terms of his $38 million in donations, beyond a corporate charter saying OpenAI was a nonprofit.Article continues below this adBut he continued repeating his belief that OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and President Greg Brockman “stole a charity.” Musk is alleging breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment, seeking upwards of $134 billion in damages to fund OpenAI’s nonprofit mission, and trying to oust Altman and Brockman from the company.Musk’s testimony has repeatedly referenced the prospect that AI may destroy humanity. In a Tesla earnings call last year, he said he needed more control over the company to oversee its “robot army,” a reference to its Optimus robots now made in Fremont. He said both Thursday and Wednesday that he didn’t mean in a military sense, but mentioned the possibility of a “Terminator” scenario.San Francisco Chronicle LogoMake us a Preferred Source to get more of our news when you search.Add Preferred SourceJudge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers said the trial is about OpenAI’s nonprofit mission, not the prospect of a tech extinction event. She told Musk to stop talking about it in further testimony.“They got it. It’s enough,” Gonzalez Rogers said.Article continues below this adNear the end of his testimony, Musk said OpenAI’s lawyer William Savitt was asking a leading question — which Savitt is allowed to do during cross-examination. Gonzalez Rogers reminded the courtroom that Musk is “not a lawyer.” “I did take Law 101,” Musk said.When asked if he was aware that OpenAI’s nonprofit arm is funding healthcare research including Alzheimer’s studies, Musk said he di...
Elon Musk Seemingly Admits xAI Has Used OpenAI's Models to Train Its ...
**Musk Defends AI Model Training Practices Amidst Industry Scrutiny** In a recent legal deposition, technology mogul Elon Musk has articulated a perspective that challenges conventional notions of proprietary development within the artificial intelligence sector. Musk, a prominent figure in the AI landscape through his ventures like xAI and his past involvement with OpenAI, asserted that the practice of utilizing competitor models for training new AI systems is a widely accepted norm within the industry. This statement comes amidst ongoing discussions and legal proceedings that probe the methodologies employed by leading AI research organizations. The context of Musk’s remarks was a sworn testimony, a setting that typically demands precise and considered responses. His defense of this training methodology suggests a belief that such cross-pollination of data and model architectures is not only common but also a logical and perhaps necessary component of rapid AI advancement. The underlying argument appears to be that in a field characterized by intense competition and a shared goal of pushing technological boundaries, replicating and building upon existing foundational work is an efficient pathway to innovation. This perspective, however, is likely to be met with considerable debate. Critics and competitors may view the use of another entity’s developed models as a form of intellectual property infringement or an unfair advantage. The development of sophisticated AI models requires substantial investment in terms of computational resources, talent, and time. The idea that these developed assets could be leveraged by rivals, even for training purposes, raises complex questions about fairness, competition law, and the future of intellectual property in the digital age. Musk’s assertion also implicitly highlights the secretive nature that often surrounds AI development. While the broad principles of machine learning are publicly understood, the specific datasets, architectures, and training regimes employed by leading labs are frequently proprietary. This lack of transparency can make it difficult to ascertain the true origins of advancements and to ensure a level playing field for all participants. The implications of Musk’s statement extend beyond the immediate legal context. It forces a broader conversation about the ethical considerations and competitive dynamics that are shaping the future of artificial intelligence. As AI continues to permeate various a...
Elon Musk Admits xAI Used OpenAI Technology To Train Its Own Models
Topline Elon Musk said Thursday his artificial intelligence startup, xAI, has used technology from OpenAI to train its own AI models, a process commonly called distilling, making the ...
Elon Musk walked into a courtroom this morning and testified ...
24 hours ago ... Elon Musk, founder of xAI and co-founder of OpenAI, has argued that human reinforcement learning creates a key limitation in modern AI systems.
