Vetted by NeuralPress's Multi-Agent Verifier for strict factual validity and event relevance. Our compliance engine cross-checks and filters search results to ensure zero false correlations or misleading content.
Primary Sources
Avec's Tinder-styled email app allows you to swipe ... - TechCrunch
Apps like Superhuman and Mimestream have tried to get people to inbox zero on the desktop. Now, a new app called Avec for mobile devices aims to get you through your inbox using Tinder-style swipe cards and voice-based replies. The app, initially available on iOS, uses Tinder-style cards where, by default, the left swipe adds the email to a pile that you can address later, and the right swipe adds it to the done (or archive) pile. The email “stack” of cards also has a button at the bottom that lets you hold it to reply to emails using your voice. When you release the button after speaking, the transcription will show up as a draft. You can review the transcription for errors, make any necessary edits, and then send the email. Avec said that while apps like Wispr Flow, Willow, and Monolouge exist, they are constrained by Apple’s APIs, and users need to install them as a separate keyboard app to work. Meanwhile, Avec has the full context of your email, so it can understand names and apply better edits based on the tone of the email. Because of this context, the email app can understand your personal email style as well, the company said. Image Credits: Screenshot by TechCrunchImage Credits:Screenshot by TechCrunch While managing your inbox, Aved lets you mark unimportant emails by swiping down a particular email. The email will learn from what’s put in the unimportant pile and can show it to you in a group instead of forcing you to triage these emails one by one. While the card-based interface is Avec’s unique feature, it also offers a plain old list-based view. The app was founded by Jonathan Unikowksi, who previously worked at Replit in a product engineering role. Unikowksi said he was thinking about building tools that he would use every day. He explored ideas like building a browser, but eventually ended up with email. Techcrunch event San Francisco, CA | October 13-15, 2026 “It’s this thing that hasn’t changed for twenty-five years,” Unikowksi told TechCrunch over a call. He said Gmail was the last big change in email, which has had long-term impacts on how email is managed. “It’s a big part of everyone’s life, no matter how much they hate it. And it seemed very clear to me that through a combination of really good design and, of course, the judicious use of these new AI tools, we could do much better,” Image Credits: AVECImage Credits:Avec Avec is not alone in having this thought process. Apart from Superhuman, apps like Shortwave and Spike...
Which Technologies Are Best Suited for Building a Tinder-Like App?
If left, then no hard feelings. Maybe there are better app tutorials out there for you. If right, then great! Let’s start learning. Tinder processes 1.6 billion swipes per day across 75 million monthly active users. It may look like a simple swipe-the-card-for-a-chance-at-love game, but behind that deceptively simple interface sits real-time event processing, geosharded search infrastructure, and a chat platform that must deliver messages in milliseconds. Here, we want to go through the type of tech, frameworks, and infrastructure you’d need to build a Tinder-like app. We'll start where your users start: the swipe. What’s the Best Mobile Framework for a Swipe-Based Dating App? The entire product experience of a dating app lives or dies by how satisfying that flick of the thumb feels. At 60 fps (16 ms render time), users won't consciously notice a dropped frame, but they'll feel it, and in a dating app, that feeling translates into jank, which directly translates into churn. That makes the swipe card interaction the single most performance-sensitive element in your entire stack. Native development (Swift + Kotlin) still delivers the best results. Tinder, Bumble, and most top-tier dating apps develop natively. Tinder's Android team has adopted Jetpack Compose for its declarative UI layer, while its iOS codebase uses SwiftUI alongside UIKit. Native gives you full access to platform gesture APIs, zero abstraction overhead on animations, and the deepest integration with camera, location, and notification systems. Of course, maintaining two separate native codebases is expensive. If you don't have the budget or headcount for dedicated iOS and Android teams, two cross-platform options are worth serious consideration: Flutter offers the best cross-platform animation performance. You consistently show smooth scrolling with no memory or CPU spikes during heavy interactions. Flutter's built-in animation APIs make Tinder-style card stacks straightforward. React Native will be the fastest path to market for JS devs. The Gesture Handler enables 60fps swipe animations by running directly on the UI thread. Tinder competitor Hinge uses React Native in production. The tradeoff is higher memory usage and potential frame drops under sustained UI stress. So which one should you pick? Honestly, the right answer depends more on your team than the technology. If you have the budget for two native teams, go native. If you need to ship fast with one codebase and your app is gestu...
Essential Dating App Features for a Successful Match Experience
Advanced search features in dating apps allow users to filter potential matches based on specific criteria such as interests, location, and lifestyle choices. Core Matching Feed (Swipe or Card List) Decide early: do you want swipe-style (like Tinder or Bumble) or tap-to-like in a vertical feed (Hinge-style cards)?
Comparison of email clients - Wikipedia
For all of these clients, the concept of "HTML support" does not mean that they can process the full range of HTML that a web browser can handle. Almost all email readers limit HTML features, either for security reasons, or because of the nature of the interface. CSS and JavaScript can be especially problematic.
